Skip to content

Glossary

What Is an Evidence Level

Evidence levels mark claim credibility from L1 to L5; cross-citing owned domains counts at most as L4.

Author
Xingge
Published
2026-11-09
Updated
2026-11-09
Level
L2 Reproducible
Version
1.0

Term details

Name
What Is an Evidence Level
Type
Glossary
ID
evidence-level-en

What Is an Evidence Level

An evidence level marks claim credibility on a scale from L1 to L5: self-description, reproducible, primary source, index cross-corroboration, and third party. Cross-citing owned domains counts at most as L4 and is not counted as external corroboration.

Definition

This site's working definition: the level describes how far a reader can verify, not how confident the author is. The level must be shown in a visible position on the page and published together with the content.

LevelMeaningTypical material
L1Self-descriptionOnly a self-introduction, with no method detail
L2ReproducibleSteps, checklists, and templates, with effects not validated by a third party
L3Primary sourceStandard text, policy text, public datasets, or real experiment records
L4Index cross-corroborationMultiple on-site formats corroborate each other but remain owned
L5Third partyClients, institutions, media, or verified platform accounts, all non-owned subjects

Boundaries: what it is easily confused with

Easily confused conceptKey difference
Quality scoreA quality score rates writing and compliance; a level marks source strength
CredibilityA level is a source type, not a subjective impression
CertificationCertification is granted by an outside body; a level is self-assessed and published

Common misconceptions

  • Marking original methods as L3. Original content defaults to L2 unless it quotes primary text.
  • Using a network of owned sites to reach L5. Cross-citing owned domains counts at most as L4.
  • Recording the level only in the back office. The level must appear where readers can see it.

Basis and verification

This site's defaults are: original methods and templates L2, glossary and metrics L2, real experiments L3, editorial policy L2. A higher level requires an openable primary source.

Review cycle: 180 days.

Related sections: glossary index, method index, metric index, editorial policy.

Evidence

Author

Xingge

GEOA method research, focused on how Chinese LLMs cite and describe brands accurately.

Entity https://shingle.com.cn/#person

Author profile